Analysis-plan to output consistency checklist
A compact review path for finding mismatches between the planned question and the result being reported.
Read articleA compact review path for finding mismatches between the planned question and the result being reported.
Read articleFluent code and explanations require the same independent checks as any other analysis, plus careful verification of invented assumptions.
Read articleTrace the chain from question to data, model, diagnostics, interpretation, and reproducible output.
Read articleA useful R workflow makes inputs, transformations, models, diagnostics, outputs, and environment assumptions inspectable.
Read articleMenus can execute procedures, but they cannot align the question, variables, assumptions, diagnostics, and interpretation.
Read articleShared sites, teams, people, households, and time points can make ordinary independence assumptions misleading.
Read articleMissingness affects the analysis population, estimand, uncertainty, and credibility long before a model is fitted.
Read articleModel choice begins with the estimand, outcome support, dependence, sampling, and missingness, not a significance threshold.
Read articleExploration and confirmation answer different questions and require different commitments before estimation.
Read articleA consistent score can still fail to measure the intended construct or support the comparison a study needs.
Read article